Michael Jackson search peak gives space on Google

What about this, search peak gives space on Google

Some scientists and other events like the gigantic tube in France. MTV Sweden has a moment with Michael Jackson videos for the moment which I can here in the background. It says that a artist (painter) ore what ever becomes famous when he/she is dead. Do you need to be a "dead famous" to get some space on Google?

Well he´s gone and that´s it. Sadly enough he past away to early, with his lacerate body and some help from (?????????).

Here is Google Blog about search peak of Michale Jackson. Killed or not been killed, to bee or not to bee, is there any being behind this scene?

Read more

Obesity, one of many world wide issues

"Obesity" is one of many issues and on every agenda in many countries, but obesity is a world wide issue. Obesity is both a sickness which is very hard to deal with along with lack of knowledge how you are sopose to eat and exercise. From my perspective there is also "laziness" alot of laziness I must ad. We don´t walk och run as we did before.



BMI (Body Mass Indez) is one way to "measure" if you are over weight. Your height compare to your weihgt and your age are soppose to have a certene balance. I´m 6 feet 11 and my weight is 185 lbs wich gives me a BMI of 18,9 wich is a healthy weight in my age.

Test your self here, with a BMI culculator.

Yes, absolutely, you have the opportunity to choose, and you have the right to be obese if that is your wish!!! But "obese" also create very big cost´s for every tax payers/society´s and much more for your self and your family. This is a world wide issue with one answer, exercise and eat healthy. Those who has a disease and therefore "obese" must seek help, and fight all they can to receive it.

I found one incredible graf of the "Obese development" (scroll down so you don´t miss it.) from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Wich gives you some history of USA growth of obesity.


Other blogs: Big fat blog (one of many blogpost)

Read more

Shooting the boss, as team building exercise

How did this happen, play "video games" as exercise "Team-building". That sounds something that Google would apply in there "Room for write plans´s, how we take over the world." Nothing bad with that unless you have some bad plans for every speices on the planet.

I had some cind of team-buildning exercise, more like a reward for "well done". Keep the god work up. That included paintball, and some sport´s activetys, visit a bar and so on. But never did we two hours of playing computer games where you are suppose to blow the head of your colligues or your boss.

Mr Grinnel say´s [Source, cnet.com]
It's about "bonding," Grinnell said, when asked what the benefit to his company is of paying his team to play games. "We laugh until we cry when we play these games. We can do the thing where we have company dinners, and company functions, but those really aren't stress relief. At times, they can be more stress than they're worth."
Added employee Lee Mims, "You don't get to shoot your boss very much. It's kind of nice when you get a head shot on your boss."

Nope, that´s right, you don´t do it in real life. Those hwo say´s that video games and action movies is the responsible for som of all whiloents may be right. Ore is it lack of knowlige from what´s real and is´t.?

And Kim added that he thinks of multiplayer video games like Combat Arms as akin to playing basketball or golf, or even going out for a drink, as a way for colleagues to learn more about each other. But Combat Arms, for one, costs nothing, he pointed out, so properly managed, it is nothing but a net positive for companies. [Source, cnet.com]

My Opinion:
Only the future can tell us if thay have chosen "the strategy". My opinion is that "every way is good eccept the bad ones". (Outher´s who has a opinion, "newstin.com", "kbbtech.com" in the issue.)

Offcourse there is other ways te keep your employees happy, [howstuffworks.com]

"The following 10 tips illustrate that making employees happy usually doesn't include dollar signs, either. Rather, it's intangible incentives that produce the concrete results." Read full story

Read more

Distracted drivers, deathpenalty to create attention?

New York Times has a article about distracting drivers on the street´s. Why this behavior? I ask you who type text message on your bluberry or iphone.

In the country I live in is´t it forbidden to talk in your phone while you are driving. Something we should adapt. But that is not the issue in this blogpost. I don´t understand why people drive and text message at the same time.

Quote from New York Times Video "Distracting drivers"
"Lightning a cigarette at the same time xxx text message while he/she drive the car with the knee."

Do we need death penalty, so that human beings understand that the behavior is´t acceptable? I do hope not, but you should have a huge "penalty/fine" something like 1 000 dollar´s.

Read more

Hold hands, and what happend with "yes we can"

This picture of "The globe" wich I found on a website, gives me "the" answer how we can salve many problem´s we have today. To begin with we need to "Gung-Ho" which means "Work together".

If we can´t hold hands like this no mater hwo you are ore where you come from, we will not accomplice anything.

Middle east situation, Typhoon in Taiwan and many more horrible situation can only be solved if be beging to "work together". But we also need to take ower own responsible. What each man/woman can to is to become friend with there enemy´s. However I´m not trying to be seen as a man with"groupie á la 1969:s tohughts".

A child asked a question to her older"
-why does war exist?"

"The older" answered,

-Why do you fight with your sister/brother.

*

It is also confusing to me how everybody thinks that one person is "Superman" in the begining. After a while everybody forget´s wich cind of issues we are dealing with. And not to forget, you do not move a mountain in a few hour´s, wich take´s several weeks. The issue about President Barack Obama hwo lost some popularity as the blog "Behind the numbers" says:

Did President Obama accelerate his public image problems by venturing into the racial politics swirling around Henry Louis Gates Jr.'s arrest in Cambridge? [source, "A Gates effect".]



Well, did "Mr President of United States of America" created a mountain of hope, trust, faith. And suddenly this "Superman" din´t exist, therefore everybody lost there hope, trust and faith of this cartoon-figure who faded.

My opinion in this issue is that Barack Obama is one ordinary human being and nothing more. On his shoulders there lies one big heavy rock with a big pile of decision to make with non easy answers. He might slipp in key issues [slipping on key issues], ore there is to many of them?

Read more